That's the one big takeaway from the exhibition.
It marvels me how one can be so diversely talented in so many fields and be constantly curious about nature.
He applies what is gathered in one field to another. (What do u call that? It's knowledge construction, at its finest.)
His art is so grounded in math and science.
So disciplined and structured, it leaves me wondering...
Is he romantic?
Can he be?
Owell, it was never the side of him that was marveled, anyway.
And that, made him a rather odd ball admist artists and painters.
For he seemed so rational that emotions were never his core expression as opposed to nature and realism.
Owell, who is to judge?
No comments:
Post a Comment